Consultation Question 85

Object

Representation ID: 396

Received: 22/02/2021

Respondent: Mr Kurt Brogden

The proposed significant developments will have a detrimental effect on the environmentally sensitive Greenfield sites and the impact on valued open space who's loss would be detrimental to the residents heath and wellbeing and have adverse environmental impact.

Object

Representation ID: 728

Received: 04/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Ngaire Broadbelt

Damaging to wildlife & their habitats, local school full, high traffic problems, flood waters, spoiling the appearance, new homes too close to pylons, old mines underground.

Object

Representation ID: 735

Received: 04/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Chantelle Parkinson

I would like to object too these plans it’s going to spoils our beautiful view our wild life our beautiful woodland area the habitat for fox birds owls and cows and more our areas were our children go on walks are going to be affected it’s going to affect our day light into our home that face onto too the affect area it will also course much more traffic which will courses much pollution in the air and there also going to be parking issues

Object

Representation ID: 1060

Received: 09/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Rory Fitzpatrick

I believe this development will take away the last remaining green space in our local area. It will cause dangerous amounts of traffic in close proximity to the local school and through to the local park endangering children. It will also cause overpopulation of the area which already has problems with crime and disturb the habitats of local animals including but not limited to bats, deer and various birds.

The homes which are planned are also being built on land which at one time was Cole mines and I believe previous surveys which were carried out pointed out thst building here would not be safe.

Object

Representation ID: 1493

Received: 14/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Michael Barraclough

There are five proposed developments in a small area off Woodside Estate, seeking to build circa 300 houses, if all of these developments are approved the impact for local residents will be very significant. I would ask that an impact assessment is done for the totality of the five developments as well as the existing individual developments. For example, what green space will be left for residents on Woodside Estate if all five developments go ahead? What is the impact on the character of the estate of 300 new houses?

I have supported 3 developments and objected to two developments.

Object

Representation ID: 3748

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr C Duke

Concerns are raised including relating to how the plan is structured, bias in decision making, housing numbers and densities, viability, loss of green filed and green belt land, infrastructure, failure to identify the Richard Dunne site which could accommodate significant housing, conflicts of interest, to land gifted in trust for open space and recreation, to the provision of loss of and analysis of public open space, to how S106 monies are and have been uses, and to local opposition to proposals.

Object

Representation ID: 3856

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Martin

Agent: Athena Planning and Development

The landowners of Royds Hall Farm continue to be supportive of the allocation of Site SW14/H and are seeking the allocation of Site SW/034B for housing development. SW/034B is located directly adjacent to allocated Site SW14/H, is contiguous to the built up area and would form an acceptable and sustainable urban extension which could significantly contribute to the housing requirement for the Royds and Wibsey local area and support the transformational change and regeneration of Woodside. The landowners are working with BMDC Estates on the establishment of a Collaboration Agreement for the future marketing and sale of SW14/H and are committed to bringing these sites forward for development.

Support

Representation ID: 5572

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Rachel Kipling

Strongly support the increase in blue green infrastructure, greenspace and trees, and connectivity for people and wildlife. Safe walking and cycling routes are key to changing behaviour and improving health and wellbeing.

Object

Representation ID: 5752

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Dorothy Sadowski

In April 2013, responsibility for public health moved from the NHS to local authorities.
This existing landscape provides a healthy place encouraging people to exercise; increasing social interaction and reducing anti-social behaviour, isolation and stress, resulting in restorative, uplifting and healing for both physical and mental health conditions.

Existing roads are insufficient to cope with extra traffic. Routes along Meadway and Fenwick Drive are already access only, demonstrating the need for traffic control. Extra traffic from this development equals additional hazard to local residents, particularly at school times where there is no allocated parking area.
The Proposed land between Royds dam to Royds Hall Lane is known to have poorly documented, abandoned mine workings resulting in possible subsidence.
Health issues are related to high voltage power lines which overhang the proposed development.
The Development, excessive in scale given its location, will have a significant negative environmental impact on Judy Woods.

Comment

Representation ID: 15432

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Highways England (Yorkshire & North East Team)

It is not considered that locating development within the
settlements within Bradford South West, on their own, will have a severe impact on the capacity, operation and safety of the SRN, and this will be identified through the transport evidence base being prepared by the Council / the individual assessment of the transport implications of the sites by the sites’ promoters.
However, the quantum of sites forms part of a wider cumulative impact within the Bradford South West Area and the rest of the development aspirations within the Plan could severely impact the SRN, and this cumulative impact will need to be established by the Council and considered by Highways England.

Object

Representation ID: 17154

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

Royds Ward is already highly urbanised with overstretched infrastructure. The cumulative impact of the housing sites proposed in the draft Local Plan will worsen an already inequitable position.

In particular, the major sites suggested remove significant countryside and open spaces from the southern borders of the ward and the communities that live there. This also further distances accessible countryside from all residents in an already highly built-up area. The local infrstructure is not capable of sustaining these developments.

I have detailed concerns regarding the inclusion of the following sites: SW14/H; SW26/H; SW30/H; SW32/H; SW34/H