Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchObject
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE18/H - Ned Lane, Holme Wood
Representation ID: 29181
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed
Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which
that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is
concluded that the development would
still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public
benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE31/H - Land west of Ned Lane, Holme Wood
Representation ID: 29183
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed
Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which
that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is
concluded that the development would
still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public
benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE14/H - Albert Terrace, Oakenshaw
Representation ID: 29186
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The site is located opposite a Grade II listed former goods station and warehouse which sits in an elevated position overlooking the site.
Whilst we welcome the inclusion of a reference to the proximity of this designated heritage asset as a constraint in the sites pro forma, if allocated, the Plan should make it clear that development proposals for this area would need to ensure that those elements which contribute to the significance of this building are not harmed.
Site SE14/H (site reference error amended), add the following additional Development Consideration to the site pro forma:
‘Development should conserve and, where possible, enhance those elements which contribute to the significance of the Grade II Listed former goods station.’
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE22/H - Furnace Road, Oakenshaw
Representation ID: 29190
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The site is located opposite a Grade II listed Former Goods Station and warehouse which sits in an elevated position overlooking the site. Whilst we welcome the inclusion of a reference to the proximity of this designated heritage asset as a Constraint in the sites pro forma,
if allocated, the Plan should make it clear that development proposals for this area would need to ensure that those elements which contribute to the significance of this building are not harmed.
Site SE22/H (amended site reference error), add the following additional Development Consideration to the site pro forma:
‘Development should conserve and, where possible, enhance those elements which contribute to the significance of the Grade II Listed former goods station.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE46/H - Land west of Tong Lane and east of Holme Wood
Representation ID: 29192
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
In order to demonstrate that the allocation of this area is not incompatible with the requirements of the NPPF, as part of the Evidence Base underpinning the Plan there needs to be an assessment of what contribution this currently-undeveloped area makes to those elements which contribute to the significance of these heritage assets and what effect the loss of this site and its
subsequent development might have upon their significance.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Registered Buildings and Listed Buildings in its
vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their
significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Registered Buildings and Listed Buildings,
then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which
contribute to the significance of the Registered Buildings and any of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE47/H - Westgate Hill Street, Tong Lane, Holme Wood
Representation ID: 29193
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
In order to demonstrate that the allocation of this area is not incompatible with the requirements of the NPPF, as part of the Evidence Base underpinning the Plan there needs to be an assessment of what contribution this currently-undeveloped area makes to those elements which contribute to the significance of these heritage assets and what effect the loss of this site and its
subsequent development might have upon their significance.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Registered Buildings and Listed Buildings in its
vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their
significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Registered Buildings and Listed Buildings,
then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which
contribute to the significance of the Registered Buildings and any of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SE48/H - Westgate Hill Street, Tong
Representation ID: 29194
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
In order to demonstrate that the allocation of this area is not incompatible with the requirements of the NPPF, as part of the Evidence Base underpinning the Plan there needs to be an assessment of what contribution this currently-undeveloped area makes to those elements which contribute to the significance of these heritage assets and what effect the loss of this site and its
subsequent development might have upon their significance.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Registered Buildings and Listed Buildings in its
vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their
significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Registered Buildings and Listed Buildings,
then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which
contribute to the significance of the Registered Buildings and any of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SW47/E - Between Clayton Lane and Lister Arms, Manchester Road
Representation ID: 29195
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed
Building in its vicinity, and what impact development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Building, then the measures by which that
harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which
contribute to the significance of the Listed Building, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SW1/H - Back Fold, Clayton
Representation ID: 29196
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
Historic England considers that the HIA has undervalued the contribution which this site makes to the rural setting and significance of the Conservation Area. The buildings fronting Town End are largely C18 but it is likely that they replace earlier medieval buildings on the site. They appear to follow the trace of medieval burgage plots and it looks as though the fields to the rear and their stone boundaries formed the limit of the medieval burgage. As this is the only remaining area of the historic village where this can still be appreciated, they make a positive contribution to the character and significance of the Conservation Area. This also remains the last vestige of the rural setting of the historic settlement that remains
free of development. The development of this site, as allocated, is likely to result in considerable harm to the setting and appreciation of the Conservation Area.
a) Delete this allocation entirely.
or
b) Delete the northern part of this site (illustrated as causing harm to heritage assets in the Heritage Impact
Assessment);
and
c) Amend the first Development Consideration in the site proforma for this site to read: “A low density scheme utilising appropriate and sympathetic scale, design and
materials is required which minimises impact on landscape character and heritage assets.”
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
SW5/H - Langberries, Clayton Heights
Representation ID: 29197
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
See attachment for full representation.
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed
Building in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this largely undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Building, then the measures by which that
harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which
contribute to the significance of the Listed Building, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).