Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchSupport
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 107
Representation ID: 29103
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome that each of the Local Area Strategy’s for the
Keighley area specify that development should seek to
ensure that development conserves and enhances key
heritage assets and their settings.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 108
Representation ID: 29104
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome that each of the Local Area Strategy’s for the
Keighley area specify that development should seek to
ensure that development conserves and enhances key
heritage assets and their settings.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 109
Representation ID: 29105
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome that each of the Local Area Strategy’s for the
Keighley area specify that development should seek to
ensure that development conserves and enhances key
heritage assets and their settings.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 110
Representation ID: 29106
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome that each of the Local Area Strategy’s for the
Keighley area specify that development should seek to
ensure that development conserves and enhances key
heritage assets and their settings.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 120
Representation ID: 29107
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The Local Area Strategy for Ilkley currently makes no
reference to the importance of conserving and enhancing
the areas key heritage assets, including the distinctive
Victorian and Edwardian heritage of Ilkley the significance of the archaeology of Rombald’s Moor, and the contribution which these assets make to the visitor appeal of Ilkley.
Local Area Strategy, add the following additional key element:
‘Conserve and enhance key heritage assests and their setting, especially those elements which make a significant contribution to the distinct character of this area, including the distinctive Victorian and Edwardian heritage of Ilkley and the prehistoric landscapes and
rock art of Rombald’s Moor.'
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 130
Representation ID: 29108
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome that a key element of the Local Area Strategy
for Haworth includes that development should:
Conserve and enhance the designated and undesignated
heritage of Haworth especially those elements which
make a significant contribution to the distinct character
of this area and the buildings and landscapes associated
with the Brontes.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
CC31/E - Prince's Way / One City Park
Representation ID: 29109
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The site within the City Centre Conservation Area and close to Bradford Town Hall, a Grade I Listed Building. The site is also opposite the Bradford War Memorial, Victoria Memorial and Alhambra Theatre, all of which are Grade II Listed Buildings. The development of this area could harm elements which contribute to the significance of these designated heritage assets. The principle of allocating this site, for the nature and scale of
development set out in the APP, has therefore been recently established as part of the Local Development Plan for Bradford District. To safeguard these heritage assets, we would expect the Local Plan requirements for this site relating to the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment to, as a minimum, reflect those set out in the AAP. Consequently, we welcome that the Development Considerations and Constraints & opportunities identified for this site in the Draft Local Plan reflect those in the AAP. If there have been any significant changes to the sites circumstances since its allocation in the AAP that we are not aware of, or the development proposed is significantly different (e.g. in terms of land use, density, scale, developable area etc.), the Council should undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment of the site as part of the Evidence Base to the emerging Local Plan.
Comment
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
CC32/E - Former Jacobs Well, Nelson Street
Representation ID: 29110
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The site is located opposite the City Centre Conservation Area and close to Bradford Town Hall, a Grade I Listed Building. The development of this area could harm elements which contribute to the significance of these designated heritage assets.
The principle of allocating this site, for the nature and scale of development set out in the APP, has been recently established as part of the Local Development Plan.
We would expect the Local Plan requirements for this site relating to the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment to, as a minimum, reflect those set out in the AAP. Consequently, we welcome that the
Development Considerations and Constraints & Opportunities identified for this site in the Draft Local Plan reflect those in the AAP.
However, if there have been any significant changes to the sites circumstances since its allocation in the AAP that we are not aware of, or the development proposed is significantly different (e.g. in terms of land use, density, scale, developable area etc.), the Council
should undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment of the site as part of the Evidence Base to the emerging Local Plan.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
CC33/E - Exchange Court / Vicar Lane
Representation ID: 29112
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The site located opposite the City Centre Conservation Area and close to Bradford Town Hall, a Grade I Listed Building. The development of this area could harm elements which contribute to the significance of these designated heritage assets.
The principle of allocating this site, for the nature and scale of development set out in the APP, has therefore been recently established as part of the Local Development Plan.
To safeguard these assets, we expect the Local Plan to reflect those set out in the AAP. Consequently, the Development Considerations and Constraints & Opportunities identified for this site in the Draft Local Plan need to reflect those in the AAP.
If there have been any significant changes to the sites
circumstances since its allocation in the AAP that we are not aware of, or the development proposed is significantly different (e.g. in terms of land use, density, scale, developable area etc.), the Council should undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment of the site.
Add the following to the site pro forma:
‘Any development should have regard the principles set out in the City Centre Conservation Area Assessment and Conservation Area Appraisal.’
and
‘Proposals should safeguard those elements which contribute to the significance of the adjacent Listed
Building.’
Comment
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
CC1/H - Fulton Street/Sunbridge Road
Representation ID: 29116
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The site is within the Goitside Conservation Area and the Colonial Buildings, adjacent to the sites north-west corner, is a Grade II Listed Building. The Conservation Area is included on the Heritage at Risk register. The development of this area could harm elements which contribute to the significance of these designated heritage assets. The principle of allocating this site, for the nature, has been recently established as part of the Local Development. We would expect the requirements for this site to, reflect those set out in the AAP. Consequently, we welcome that the Development Considerations and Constraints & Opportunities
identified for this site in the Draft Local Plan reflect those in the AAP. A minor amendment is needed to correct the reference made to the location of the listed building. The Colonial Buildings are located at adjacent to the sites north-west corner. If there are any significant changes to the sites circumstances since its allocation that we are not aware of, or the development proposed is significantly different (e.g. in terms of land use, density, scale, developable area etc.), the Council should undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment of the site as part of the Evidence Base to the emerging Local Plan.
Amend the first bullet point under Constraints and Opportunities on the site pro forma to read:
‘The site lies within the Goitside Conservation Area and there is a Grade II listed building adjacent to its northwestern corner.’