Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Object

Representation ID: 29262

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).

Object

Representation ID: 29269

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

The western boundary of the site is close to the Grade II listed Dean House. Two further Grade II Listed Buildings are to the north-west of the site. The development of this area could harm elements which contribute to the significance of this designated heritage asset. Whilst the setting of this building has experienced significant change with the recent development on the east side of Allerton Lane it is still necessary to consider the impact of the development of this site on this designated heritage asset. If allocated, the Plan should make it clear that development proposals for this area would need to ensure that those elements which contribute to the significance of this heritage asset are not harmed.
Site NW15/H, add the following additional Development Consideration to the site pro forma:
‘Development should conserve and, where possible, enhance those elements which contribute to the significance of heritage assets in the vicinity of the site.’

Object

Representation ID: 29271

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).

Object

Representation ID: 29274

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).

Object

Representation ID: 29281

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

see attachment for full representation.
Historic England would concur with this analysis and with the assessment of the degree of harm that the development of this site would be likely to cause. Historic England would also endorse the mitigation measures which have been put forward in the Heritage Impact Assessment and considers that these are likely to be effective in reducing the harm to the level indicated. Although we do consider that the HIA could provide further guidance regarding the form of development that might be appropriate in the Amber shaded area.
However, in order to reduce the potential harm to that level, the mitigation measures which the Heritage impact Assessment has put forward need to be implemented as part of any future development proposal for this area. Unfortunately, as currently worded, the development considerations for this site do not adequately reflect the mitigation measures set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment. Therefore, an additional development consideration is necessary to tie the mitigation measures set out in the HIA into the Plan.

Site NW21/H, add an additional bullet point under the sites development considerations to read: ‘’Development proposals should implement the recommendations set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment, or other suitable mitigation measures agreed by the Local Planning Authority to avoid or minimise harm to the significance of heritage assets and their settings.’

Object

Representation ID: 29282

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).

Support

Representation ID: 29283

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

The site is located opposite The Black Swan Public House and Swan Hill, both Grade II Listed Buildings. There are also two Grade II* Listed Buildings, Frizingley Hall and Frizley Old Hall, 50 metre to the south-east of the site. The development of this area could harm
elements which contribute to the significance of these designated heritage assets. We welcome the inclusion of a reference to the proximity of these designated heritage assets as a Constraint in the sites pro forma, and that the Development Considerations highlight that the design
and layout of development should seek to protect the setting of these heritage assets. This will alert potential developers of the need to take account of those elements which contribute to their significance, and ensure that they are not harmed by development proposals.

Object

Representation ID: 29284

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).

Support

Representation ID: 29285

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

The site is within St Paul Conservation Area and 80 metres to the south-west of Oakhurst, a Grade II Listed Building. The Conservation Area is included on the Heritage at Risk register. The development of this area could harm elements which contribute to the significance of these designated heritage assets. We welcome the inclusion of a reference to the proximity of these designated heritage assets as a Constraint in the sites pro forma, and that the Development Considerations highlight that the design and layout of development should ensure that any impacts on these heritage assets are avoided or mitigated. This will alert potential developers of the need to take account of those elements
which contribute to their significance, and ensure that they are not harmed by development proposals.

Object

Representation ID: 29286

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).