BU2/H - Scalebor House, Moor Lane

Object

Representation ID: 1898

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Carole Bullock

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I am concerned about the increased volume of traffic that these additional houses will create coming through an already busy and congested route.

Object

Representation ID: 1943

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Kathryn Davenport

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate no thought has been given to the overall impact on the residents of estate and the wider community who use the estate for external clubs.

Object

Representation ID: 2008

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Ian Bullock

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I am extremely worried about the inevitable high increase in traffic flow through an already busy and congested estate. I am particularly concerned about children’s safety and welfare.

Object

Representation ID: 2017

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Paget

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a very recent (2001) restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land in favour of all 185 owners on the Scalebor Estate, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate whose house is adjacent to where access would be proposed the idea is nonsensical. Ron Lawton Crescent is already virtually impassable often due to parking issues. Further housing using this same access would lead to enormous loss of amenity and huge safety concerns.

Object

Representation ID: 2056

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Sarah Booth

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release. As a local resident on the scalebor estate this will ruin the area and cause increased traffic and it would be chaos, the playing field at scalebor is busy at weekends with cars already parking at the side of the road only leaving a single road lane

Object

Representation ID: 2065

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Katrina Paget

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a very recent (2001) restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land in favour of all 185 owners on the Scalebor Estate, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

As a local resident on the Scalebor estate whose house is adjacent to where access would be proposed the idea is nonsensical. Ron Lawton Crescent is already virtually impassable often due to parking issues. Further housing using this same access would lead to enormous loss of amenity and huge safety concerns.

Object

Representation ID: 2066

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Damian Collinge

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 2067

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Claire Collinge

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 2157

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: DS Insolvency Ltd

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate this development is wholly inappropriate and damaging to green belt which will be lost forever.

Object

Representation ID: 2158

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Bryan Millar

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I feel this proposal would have a massive detrimental impact on day to day life of existing residents, create safety, congestion and environmental hazards and would be totally at odds with the expert advice already accepted by the council. Far more suitable alternative sites are also available to the council for development.

Object

Representation ID: 2161

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: DS Insolvency Ltd

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate i strongly object to this development

Object

Representation ID: 2254

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Chapman

In summary, as a local resident, I object for the reasons outlined above and in particular access to the site. Our own access drive, Highlands, is totally unsuitable due to the lack of sufficient visibility splays onto Moor Lane and the fact it is in private ownership. I also have grave concerns relating to my private garden being overlooked by the numerous new houses that would be built. Also, I feel the demolition of such an imposing and historical house is totally unacceptable. The history of Scalebor House dates back as long as the hospital itself if not further. Traffic Generation on the already busy Moor Lane and lack of local amenities, in particular schools, if also of concern. Therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option

Object

Representation ID: 2276

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Archie Raeside

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release. As a local resident on the Scalebor estate, the disruption will have a huge negative impact on all our lives. This development means having to put up with noise pollution due to building works, and continuous large plant driving through Ron Lawton Crescent for a long period of time. Massive increase of personal vehicle throughput will not be sustainable with just one access point.

Object

Representation ID: 2287

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Natalie Raeside

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate, the disruption will have a huge negative impact on all our lives. It means having to put up with noise pollution due to building works, and continuous large plant driving through Ron Lawton Crescent for a long period of time. Where will the children go to school?

Object

Representation ID: 2349

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Leanne Barlow

As a local resident on the Scalebor estate the proposal is nonsensical. Ron Lawton Crescent is already virtually impassable often due to parking issues. Further housing using this same access would lead to enormous loss of amenity and huge safety concerns.

Object

Representation ID: 2366

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Linda Kelly

Enough of wrecking our village. We do not need yet more housing here if the 500 are built at Sun Lane. The infrastructure cannot cope with this volume of houses and people. Increase in traffic into and around the village, what about primary and secondary school places, GP surgery, etc. Also you say burley is an economic growth zone. Where is the evidence for this? This proposal is yet more council and developer greed at the expense of a well established community and we have had enough. There is plenty of brownfield in the borough and in places where the housing need is greater. You should be prioritising this.

Object

Representation ID: 2376

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mr j spolnik

My objection centres around the protection of the Greenbelt and its relentness erosion within the Wharfe Valley with no consideration to wildlife and the environment.
More pressure on schools, transport infrastucture and local healthcare these are the facts.
Access through an already congested Station Rd/ Moor Lane is unacceptable.
The local authorities hypocrisy is palpable in this application.
In summary the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Greenbelt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site.
There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 2411

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Andrew Carr

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate with two young children and think due to road structure they would be more at risk due to the overload of traffic and parking

Object

Representation ID: 2505

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Talia Meer

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate the extra traffic this will create will be unbearable.

Object

Representation ID: 2559

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mr James Bullock

I object to this development on the basis of inappropriate use of greenbelt. I am aware that one house near this land wanted to convert an existing dwelling as this was rejected by Bradford council on the basis of an inappropriate use of greenbelt land. I am therefore at a loss to understand how permission for one conversion can be rejected but permission for 110 houses is being considered by the same council. I also have the same concerns I have noted in my previous comments that the numbers of houses proposed for this village fail to take into account any village infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 2567

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Brodaty

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

As a local resident of Burley, we are not averse to make a contribution to local housing needs, but the developments are totally excessive and needlessly build on Green Belt, and could detriment the nature of our village forever.

Object

Representation ID: 2575

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Samantha Bullock

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a very recent (2001) restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land in favour of all 185 owners on the Scalebor Estate, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate whose house is adjacent to where access would be proposed the idea is nonsensical. Ron Lawton Crescent is already virtually impassable often due to parking issues. Further housing using this same access would lead to enormous loss of amenity and huge safety concerns.

Object

Representation ID: 2576

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Scott Brittain

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a very recent (2001) restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land in favour of all 185 owners on the Scalebor Estate, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate whose house is adjacent to where access would be proposed the idea is nonsensical. Ron Lawton Crescent is already virtually impassable often due to parking issues. Further housing using this same access would lead to enormous loss of amenity and huge safety concerns.

Object

Representation ID: 2577

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Claire Raistrick

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 2610

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Charlotte Billington

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 2632

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Cornwell Thomson

In summary, the development of the Scalebor site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate it is extremely disappointing, firstly to see how Bradford council have a total disregard for destroying this beautiful green space, which will never regain to its natural habitat, and secondly the impact this will have on the our children & their space to play. This would be a very sad outcome.

Object

Representation ID: 2667

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David Hill

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I vehemently oppose this development

Object

Representation ID: 2668

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sylvia Bergin

I feel the proposed development will put a huge strain on access roads through the existing Scalebor Park development. I also feel Burley in Wharfedale does not have sufficient infrastructure in the ways of schools and health care to cater for the extra residents the new housing would create.

Object

Representation ID: 2671

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Walker

In summary this site is not considered to be a suitable, available or a deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restrictive covenant on the title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident I object strongly to the proposed development due to increased traffic including all the additional deliveries and visitors generated which would create significant danger to residents and children, the tree protection orders in place. The restrictive covenant is significant and land should only be used for grazing to also protect wildlife as I regularly see wild Roe Deer grazing.

Object

Representation ID: 2673

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Suzanne Walker

In summary this site is not considered to be a suitable, available or a deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restrictive covenant on the title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident I object strongly to the proposed development due to increased traffic including all the additional deliveries and visitors generated which would create significant danger to residents and children, the tree protection orders in place on Scalebor Park Close /Ron Lawton Crescent. The restrictive covenant is significant and should also protect wildlife as I regularly see wild Roe Deer grazing.