BU2/H - Scalebor House, Moor Lane

Object

Representation ID: 2678

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Heather Jones

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 2700

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Alison Archer

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I strongly feel that safe access is not possible to the proposed new site. The roads at Scalebor are for a small housing estate and are not suitable for the additional traffic which these new houses would generate. Many children play out and safety would be an issue

Object

Representation ID: 2727

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr andrew mckendrick

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
In short as a local resident on the Scalebor estate I strongly recommend that the Council refuse this application as:
[a] there is inadequate road access infrastructure
[b] restrictive covenant's limit the lands use to grazing land without the consent of all existing Scalebor residents which will never occur.

Object

Representation ID: 2738

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Jane Gayton

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate, I am concerned the infrastructure of the estate could not support this proposed development.

Object

Representation ID: 2748

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Michael McCarthy

As a resident of the Scalebor estate my main objection is the problem of access through the existing estate and the impact on the local infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 2754

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sally Bowes

MAP IS IN ERROR. 'CONISBOROUGH CLOSE' IS WRONGLY IDENTIFIED AS 'RON LAWTON CRESENT'.
Clarification is required as to where the proposed site access would be. The site location within document BU2/H states 'to the west(Ron Lawton Crescent)'
Is the proposed access off Ron Lawton Crescent or Conisborough Close?
However, wherever the access is, I have concerns about the increase in local traffic movements around the Scalebor roads
which were not designed for this volume of traffic. Particularly, the junction off Ron Lawton Cresent and John Gilmour Way.
Additionally, this is a greenbelt site which supports numerous wildlife habitats, including deer,foxes and red kites. This development
will have a damaging impact on the ecology of the area.

Object

Representation ID: 2829

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Jane Catchpole

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not
considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land
ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the
proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title
constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the
site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt
release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor Park Development I strongly believe the Scalebor House proposal should not go ahead as it would be highly dangerous to increase the volume of through traffic on Ron Lawton Crescent. It is already very challenging for access due to parked cars as little parking, and also children regularly play out on this street.

Object

Representation ID: 2872

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Dr Duncan Newton

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release. Finally, I have grave reservations about the traffic implications and road safety of Moor Lane.

Object

Representation ID: 2885

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Rob Porteous

As a local resident I strongly object to this development for four reasons: local housing need, breach of the existing Green Belt boundary (namely the railway line), an existing restrictive covenant on the land and site access / road safety.

Many thanks for taking the time to read and consider my comments.

Object

Representation ID: 2929

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Lisa Shaw

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need, Green Belt considerations, impact on local wildlife and impact on local residential amenity. I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on use of the land, there is NO viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release. The site contains a beautiful Edwardian characterful property with significant local heritage and it is set in a beautiful open setting with many mature trees (subject to TPOs). The loss of this heritage site and associated Green Belt land would be very damaging to the village and adjacent residents both on the Scalebor Estate and on the Highlands development.

Object

Representation ID: 2932

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Dr sarah shaper

The proposed development is on green belt land, The are other brown field sites available such as the greenholme mill area.
The development of Scalebor Park as a former hospital was predicated on an adopted policy relating to major development sites in the Green Belt. The application of this policy resulted in a development which had no greater impact on the Green Belt. It does not, however, allow for expansion beyond the terms of the resultant development.
There is no suitable access . The site is in the vicinity of Ron Lawton Crescent With regards to the potential formation of an access/connection to the site from Ron Lawton Crescent, it is understood that a strip of land, between the site boundary and the adopted highway, comprises an amenity area associated with the Scalebor Park development. This matter is confirmed as per the land title records and highway adoption records.

Object

Representation ID: 2944

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Neil Sengupta

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need, Green Belt considerations, impact on local wildlife and impact on local residential amenity. I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on use of the land, there is NO viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release. The site contains a beautiful Edwardian characterful property with significant local heritage and it is set in a beautiful open setting with many mature trees (subject to TPOs). The loss of this heritage site and associated Green Belt land would be very damaging to the village and adjacent residents both on the Scalebor Estate and on the Highlands development.

Object

Representation ID: 2957

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Pauline McDermott

In summary, therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I am concerned in the short term, of the amount of construction traffic which will be entering the estate and the disruption and safety for the existing residents.
In the long term, an increase of possibly 200+ cars and delivery vehicles on the estate, being detrimental to our health, wellbeing and environment.

Object

Representation ID: 2959

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Stephen McDermott

In summary, therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I am concerned in the short term, of the amount of construction traffic which will be entering the estate and the disruption and safety for the existing residents.
In the long term, an increase of possibly 200+ cars and delivery vehicles on the estate, being detrimental to our health, wellbeing and environment.

Object

Representation ID: 2962

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Amy Stoyanov

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site.

Object

Representation ID: 2974

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Ann-Marie Orange

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident, I strongly protest to this development.
There is no need for further excessive housing development in the area, as it does not support a ‘need’ in terms of jobs or retail, and is just damaging to the existing village.

Object

Representation ID: 2980

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Rich Cole

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I am also very concerned about the impact the proposed access route will have on the residents. You will be aware that the estate is already very busy and additional traffic will make the situation much worse.

Object

Representation ID: 2985

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David Scott

Summary:
In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I am of the opinion that this is a non viable proposal and would have a detrimental impact on the wider environment.

Object

Representation ID: 3034

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Jonathan Greenwell

In summary the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object. There is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on Scalebor I am concerned that the impact the increased traffic will have on pollution and road safety.

I also don’t feel that additional housing anywhere in the (rural) Wharfe Valley helps Bradford to meet the requirements of levelling up northern cities, where the stated aim is to increase housing in urban areas. Burley is more than 11 miles from Bradford, and travelling by car to Leeds or Bradford takes upwards of 1hr, and will significantly increase pollution, limiting Bradfords goal of becoming carbon neutral

Object

Representation ID: 3042

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Birgit Schluckebier

I object to:
1. The proposed housing target of 625 units; and
2. The proposed allocation of land ref BU2/H for residential development.

The proposed housing allocation of 625 units (representing an increase of almost 25% on current housing numbers) is disproportionate in the context of the existing size and status of the village.
The 500 new houses for which planning permission has recently been granted in relation to the village’s Sun Lane site are sufficient and there is therefore no need to allocate further sites for development.
Furthermore, the specific site BU2/H is not suitable for development on the grounds of:
• Greenbelt considerations
• Access issues
• restrictive covenants

The proposed allocation for site BU2/H is neither suitable, available nor deliverable.
Details on these points are set out in the attached note.
The CBMDC has already considered the site and has assessed it as unsuitable for development.

Object

Representation ID: 3045

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Greenwell

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
Living locally I see no possible way which the site could be developed without an unacceptable negative impact on us as nearby residents. I have two young children and the increased traffic which would result from the development of the site would seriously jeopardise their safety on their own doorstep.

Object

Representation ID: 3137

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Dominic Lepelley

Burley’s infrastructure struggles to cope now prior to any further development and with the Sun Lane increase we will suffer across schooling, transport and local business provision never mind the needless damage to our beautiful natural green belt environment. Pure profiteering.

Object

Representation ID: 3154

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Miles Ayling

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I strongly object to what would be a clear overdevelopment of the area, damaging its character, creating excess traffic in a child friendly environment and placing more pressure on already stretched utilities.

Object

Representation ID: 3174

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Brian Wilkinson

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release. With the development in Sun lane and Burley Mill, I feel the infrastructure of the village will not be able to cope, e.g. secondary school education where Ilkley Grammar is already under pressure with numbers, as is medical provision at Grange Park Surgery. I would strongly ask the Council to concentrate on brown field sites rather than green belt sites.

Object

Representation ID: 3200

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Lisa Gibson

The development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

As a local resident on the Scalebor estate with young children, I have major concerns about road safety that the additional traffic through developing the site for residential purposes would create. Residents, delivery vehicles, no speed limits - very worrying.

Object

Representation ID: 3207

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Duggan

This allocation along with Sun Lane would take the provision above the identified need of 549 units. The site is within the green belt and there is no justification for building on this site when there is surplus brownfield land. The access will be through Scalebor Park which already serves almost 200 houses so cannot accommodate any more vehicles. As a resident of Burley I think this constitutes overdevelopment. Also, please note that there is no swimming pool or leisure centre in Burley contrary to your statement.

Object

Representation ID: 3219

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Kernahan

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

As a local resident on the Scalebor estate i strongly oppose this proposed development and believe it will be detrimental to the current Scalebor residents and surrounding wildlife, as well as to the village in general.

Object

Representation ID: 3220

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Cole

In summary, the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is: a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, no viable access solution and, the site meets 3/5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

As a local resident on Scalebor and passionate about nature, this green belt proposal is painful. Brown belt land should be the way forward for housing developments not continuous snipping away at greenbelt land. Children play in front of our house on Ron Lawton Crescent where cars already fill the street due to lack of parking. The increase in traffic poses considerable danger to them.

Object

Representation ID: 3252

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Nicky Williams

the development of this site for residential purposes is not suitable, available or deliverable on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt . I object to residential development on this site. restriction constraining the use as grazing land, no viable access and the site meets 3 of 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate the development of the subject land at Scalebor House is also not acceptable in Green Belt release terms – if one dwelling isn’t how can 110 dwellings be?
The Scalebor site was redeveloped for housing as it was a major developed site in the Green Belt and was a brownfield site. This should not now permit an extension of the existing estate in to adjacent greenfield, Green Belt land . there is no evidenced housing need or exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 3332

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Angela Duggan

In summary therefore the development of this site for residential purposes is not considered to be a suitable, available or deliverable option on the grounds of land ownership, access, housing need and Green Belt considerations and I strongly object to the proposals for any residential development on the site. There is a restriction on title constraining the subject site to use as grazing land, there is no viable access solution and the site meets 3 of the 5 Green Belt criteria with no exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
As a local resident on the Scalebor estate I think this would be overdevelopment of the estate