BA5/H - Meadowside Road/West of Baildon Cof E Primary School

Object

Representation ID: 9824

Received: 15/03/2021

Respondent: Tony Ward

The proposed development on Tong Park Fields in Baildon will:
1. Cause disruption and pollution to an unspoilt area.
2. Reduce the amenity and recreational availability of the area
3. Affect wildlife such as the Natterjack Toad that has been observed in that area. Their status is “Decreasing”.
4. Create over demand on local resources such as education, roads and services.
5. Langley Lane is a cul de sac. Traffic problems already exist, as do problems with the road surface and drainage

Object

Representation ID: 10707

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Alan North

Other sites available in Bradford that are brown belt, without building in Green Belt.
There is a site at the end of Green Lane, Baildon, there is a wooded area known as the Knoll, Baildon , which is vastly overgrown and neglected, what about the waste land called Baildon Green.
The area around the proposed site is environmentally delicate and building will threaten the delicate balance in the valley.
The level of traffic at school times is far in excess of the usage originally planned. It is almost impossible to actually get out of the road when parents are delivering or picking up children from school.
This will also have a knock on effect on surrounding roads, for example the junction of Roundwood Road/Otley Road is becoming increasingly dangerous due to the level of traffic in constant use. There seems to be no quiet time other than after 7pm.

Object

Representation ID: 11469

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tracy Mosley

Concerned by the lack of protection to the green belt, ancient woodland (protected by TPO) and the use of land which has a history of flooding.

Concerns regarding section 5.8.33. Here it is mentioned that the four Baildon primary schools are under capacity. By what extent? Detail is not provided. I would regard this as both an oversight and essential information considering the claimed major positive effect on the education SA objective for these proposed development areas.

Objection to BA5/H Meadowside Road

Whilst I understand the pressure to develop land for housing, I believe that more brownfield sites will become available once the effects of the Covid pandemic have been fully realised. Also, the document states that these sites have the potential to deliver a major positive effect for residents on the education SA Objective. This is only the case if there is ample existing provision. Currently there is not.

Object

Representation ID: 11498

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Mark & Elaine Sheldon

Number of people: 2

•Sites are Green Belt. Purpose to stop towns from continually spreading outwards.
•Countryside is valuable resource. Should not be developed to meet government housing targets.
•Development of brownfield sites for shops rather than unnecessary shops is more environmentally friendly.
•Developments will ruin local countryside and destroy natural animal and plan habitats.
•Schools and Doctors in Baildon are both at capacity. Other local service are being removed (library).
•Roads already struggle with high traffic volumes. Road network into and out of Baildon is completely congested. Can take 50 minutes to travel between Baildon and Bradford in rush hour.
•Cars increase pollution.
•Should make use of area with better transport links.
•All new housing should be built with solar panels
•Cheap housing is not environmentally friendly
•Council should push for a sustainable model with a low carbon footprint.

Object

Representation ID: 11827

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Maryan Kisler

BA5/H

I would like to object to the above planning application for additional housing for the following reasons:

1) The land is currently part of a very loved and used greenbelt area that in such an urban area needs protecting for the mental and physical health of the local residents.

2) The land is a haven for protected animals and plants such as hedgehogs, deer, rare orchids. This is also very close to ancient woodland, which would be put at additional risk.

3) The road infrastructure is residential and in my opinion not able to cope with the additional traffic that would be generated both in the building of these houses and ongoing by the new residents.

4) The area is close to an area that can be prone to flooding and I believe that building on this site would increase this risk.

Object

Representation ID: 11837

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Emma Arnold

BA5/H

I would like to object to the above planning application for additional housing for the following reasons:

1) The land is currently part of a very loved and used greenbelt area that in such an urban area needs protecting for the mental and physical health of the local residents.

2) The land is a haven for protected animals and plants such as hedgehogs, deer, rare orchids. This is also very close to ancient woodland, which would be put at additional risk.

3) The road infrastructure is residential and in my opinion not able to cope with the additional traffic that would be generated both in the building of these houses and ongoing by the new residents.

4) The area is close to an area that can be prone to flooding and I believe that building on this site would increase this risk.

Object

Representation ID: 12304

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Ruth Hughes

I object to the proposed building of 40 houses on the fields by Ladderbanks Lane over looking Tong Park Valley and Spring woods.
The fields are green belt and lead onto an area of stunning beauty and full of an extremely diverse cross section of fauna and wild life.
Building houses here would have a massive impact on this. Owls, deer, red kite to name a few can frequently been seen here.
The area is used regularly by walkers, runners, horse riders and should be preserved for it to be continually enjoyed for the generations to come.
I think we have all learn’t to appreciate nature and wildlife over the past 12 months even more and we should be nurturing it and allowing it to thrive rather than destroying it.

Please take this into consideration and think of the future of our countryside.

Comment

Representation ID: 12915

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford Local Access Forum (Chair) BHS Access Officer. Chair WHOA.

Although I believe that the “ Meadowside” development will be allowed, as many of the arguments being put forward by the local residents are invalid, I wondered if a comment from you is appropriate to perhaps reduce the number of houses in the planning proposal in order to protect the remaining lower section of Ladderbanks Lane? Bridleway Baildon 17. The top section has suffered hugely with incursion of extended domestic boundary fences, exclusion of light and ground water, all from the original 1960/70’s building. The bottom section to Tong Park, although poorly fenced is still bounded by very mature trees, original walls and an ope aspect. I feel it should have a protected status an wide margin. This route also, importantly, links two authorities.

Object

Representation ID: 13078

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Christine Crowther

Access issues - cannot be solved by a second access from within Langley Lane area as he roads in the area end up in Roundwood Road. All existing roads are narrow, dangerous and cannot be widened and have many parked cars. This is a dangerous bottleneck now and would be only become more dangerous with more traffic. The road bridge does not have footpaths. More cars would be completely unacceptable.
School access causes issues at the start and end of the school day (roads and parking).
Local schools at capacity and oversubscribed.
The land in question is part of the beautiful historical valley is used by many locals as a recreation area. Additional housing here would significantly damage the area. The infrastructure for drainage and access for large vehicles unsatisfactory.

Object

Representation ID: 13470

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Ros Crosland

Object to building on this site. Reasons are:

1. Part of Gill Beck Valley, a renowned area for flora and fauna - some of which is rare and/or protected. Close to area of scientific interest. Will be adversely affected by development. It is green belt land - needs to be protected at all costs.

2. Only one road out of the estate. Local school oversubscribed - children would have to travel elsewhere providing more traffic. Road is effectively a car park at school drop off/pick up times.

3. Field poorly drained and sloping. Springs are underneath the valley.

4. Valued green space for walking, cycling and riding. Unspoilt, quiet, peaceful and much needed for mental/physical health. Development means more people, more traffic and less green space.

5. Acts as a buffer between protected areas and Langley Lane estate. Encroaching into the valley means that protection has gone.

Object

Representation ID: 13662

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Caroline Murray

Field is Green Belt – should only be used if absolutely necessary. Loss is questionable. Provides opportunity to enjoy flora and fauna within a biodiverse habitat. Green space important for health and wellbeing. Should be protected.

Buffer to valley area. Will impact on wildlife. Loss of habitat, agricultural land and views. Potential for contamination during construction, as well as increased light and noise pollution. Will be more vehicle and heating emissions. Would be detrimental to residents. Stability and drainage heightens risk of flooding.

Langley Lane only road to/from area. Issue with traffic congestion particularly at school run times. More cars will increase this as well as impacting on safety and increasing pollution. Access is impractical due slope of existing cul de sac.

Primary school is over-subscribed. Railway station has limited parking and services. No doctors, shop or chemists nearby.

Major impact on Green Belt. Would create precedent for more Green Belt development.

Consultation taking place during pandemic - not accessible to all.

Object

Representation ID: 13979

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Colette Mallatratt

I object to your plan to build houses on this field which forms part of a local, natural meadow.
This is very much a 'go to' place for people to connect with nature and is much loved by locals and visitors from farther afield.
-Home to a diverse amount of wildlife.
-The field is right next to two paths and is a place where horses graze, birds nest and forage and rabbits and deer live.
-Impact on the landscape of historical Tong Park and Baildon.
-Retain as s greenbelt and seek brownfield space to build affordable housing.
- Issues with local primary school which already has many issues with school traffic

Object

Representation ID: 14881

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Nadine Clements

The area is one of outstanding beauty and green space for people to walk and clear their minds in this busy life. We desperately need more open space for mental health Issues.

Green belt land and so free from building.

Wildlife impacts - Bats, kite hawks, foxes, rabbits, deer, Owls, woodpeckers moor hens, partridges, badgers, and numerous varieties of birds

A path which had direct access from the end of Meadowside Road was re-routed to the edge of the field by the council/landowner. Photographic proof that the original path was accessible from the middle of the edge of the field. This should have been kept in place as a public right of way

Traffic congestion - Langley lane is extremely busy during schools times and if emergency vehicles were needed they would be unable to access part of the estate.

Extra traffic/congestion on Langley Lane would result from more houses.

Object

Representation ID: 15536

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Greg Hull

This is Green Belt in a beautiful valley sculpted by glaciers with unusual flora. The old oak trees along the Ladderbanks bridleway have TPOs.
Impact on the flora and fauna from housing developments.
Impact on Bradford Wildlife Area, an Area of Special Interest for ecological and geographical reasons.
The area is a haven for walkers, riders, runners and nature lovers and those seeking a wellbeing break for their mental and physical health.
Langley Lane contains very little in the way of shops and playgrounds. Extra housing and associated vehicles will choke the estate further especially at school run times.
The primary school has class sizes over the optimum and the local schools in Guiseley and Saltaire aren't really local. It will all add to congestion within the estate and beyond.
Removing a green area will increase runoff and risks of flooding in the valley.
This seems an incongruous addition to a planning list, it needs a rethink.

Object

Representation ID: 15662

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Rick Ansell

We wish to make known our strong objection to the proposed development on Greenbelt land near our home, just off Meadowside Road in Baildon.

Aside from the acutely obvious point that Greenbelt land is specifically not for development, the building of additional housing would certainly mean yet more congestion in the area, traffic, parking where there is none available, but also pressure on the local school system which is already oversubscribed. There is the additional massive and needless impact on the environment and its many wildlife species, as well as needless pollution, litter and waste and months, if not years of all of the above.

There are PLENTY of brownfield sites that can be developed instead - the residents here will not accept yet more unnecessary Greenfield development in our area.

I’m sure you know all of the above and much more, and we can rely on you to protect and defend our countryside.

Object

Representation ID: 16100

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Rachel Fear

Already the estate has an excessive amount of traffic. Only one access road into the estate at peak times; it is increasingly difficult to enter and exit from this road, with particularly difficult problems during school times - Baildon CE School is within the confines of the estate. Emergency vehicles would be unable to access certain parts of the estate due to the volume of school traffic.

Topography of site - towards the top of the estate and then down a steep slope - issues during icy and snowy weather.

Site borders Tong Park conservation area which attracts a large amount of walkers and visitors. T
Impact on wildlife
Would have a visually negative impact on the area.

Support

Representation ID: 16256

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Robbie Feather

Agent: ID Planning

The site adjoins the built extent of Baildon and currently lies within the Green Belt with existing built development to the south and east. The site benefits from direct access from Meadowside Road in the south west corner of the site. It is relevant to note that the site plan contained in the local Plan consultation documents is
incorrect, a land registry plan is enclosed with this representation which confirms direct access is available from Meadowside Road. The proposed allocation BA5/H requires amendment to address this fundamental error.

The site comprises a natural extension to the settlement to provide additional sustainable housing in Baildon.
The representation statement makes comments on the preferred policy options of the Local Plan in the broad context of this site and its location adjacent to the Local Growth Centre of Baildon,

Object

Representation ID: 17095

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Marije, Jamie, Emily & Rosa Nicklin

Number of people: 4

1) The land is currently part of a very loved and used greenbelt area that in such an urban area needs protecting for the mental and physical health of the local residents.

2) The land is a haven for protected animals and plants such as hedgehogs, deer, rare orchids. This is also very close to ancient woodland, which would be put at additional risk.

3) The road infrastructure is residential and unsuitable for the additional traffic - each additional house will add a minimum of 2 cars to the morning commuter traffic. Combined with current heavy traffic of parents dropping off their children at Baildon c of e during rush hour, I foresee huge challenges.

4) It is close to an area that can be prone to flooding - building on this site would increase this risk.

Object

Representation ID: 17100

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Dr Katherine Dashper

My objections relate to concern about the loss of habitat and biodiversity for wildlife and flora and the loss of valuable green space that has been invaluable particularly in the pandemic.

There is a wide variety of birds, small animals, deer, and open spaces that encourage wildlife to settle, breed and survive. The area proposed for development borders an area recognised as a Bradford Wildlife Area and an area of special interest ecologically and geologically.

There would be a loss of an area used by many for walking and horse riding.

There are other areas locally that could be used for house building (particularly brownbelt land) that would be much more suitable and would not detract from the valuable ecological resources.

Object

Representation ID: 17112

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Victoria Leather

•Vital to maintain valuable greenspaces which have been well used during the pandemic.
•Proposed losses of greenbelt must not be permitted, a more strategic view, working with our neighbours is needed. Brownfield sites in Bradford should be investigated and included in the plan ahead of greenbelt sites.
•Further development in this area would have a devastating impact on wildlife habitats.
•Infrastructure issues and under investment in Baildon.
•Schools are oversubscribed and require investment.
•Road traffic situation is poor and public transport is struggling to keep up.
•Langley Lane should be avoided at school times. Access for those living in this area is poor. As an estate with only one entrance/exit, additional housing would exacerbate problems.

Object

Representation ID: 17196

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Amanda Illingworth

Access - access to Meadowside Road and all the roads off Langley Lane can only be accessed via one route - Langley Lane directly. Access up and down Langley Lane during school hours is already problematic.
The road does not have the capacity to allow for parking as well as the flow of traffic resulting in numerous occasions when the road has been blocked by vehicles trying to travel in opposite directions.

Safety and schooling - Baildon C of E is the most oversubscribed primary school in Baildon. It would also add to traffic problems, and thus pollution, and with this I also have safety concerns for the children accessing the school.

Nature - birds including herrings and swans, deer, horses and many more. To negatively impact this habitat, and the biodiversity of this natural environment which boarders woods and acts as a buffer to the valley would be a huge shame

Object

Representation ID: 17770

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Jennifer Dennison

I strongly object to the plan of building 40 houses in the Tong Park area, the impact on the local wildlife in this area will be dramatic, there are so many birds and wildlife living here not to mention scaring the horses. Over lockdown and before my children and I venture here on walks weekly, allowing them to enjoy the beautiful countryside, please don’t take this away, there isn’t many green areas left locally, Secondly the school waiting list is already massive and would not take any more children, all 3 local schools are at capacity which will mean local people having to take their children to primary school outside of the Baildon area! The traffic on Langley Lane from the school is already horrific leading to daily reports about how bad it is and the lack of parking, another 40 houses will make this insane.

Object

Representation ID: 17771

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Ben Dennison

I object to the planning proposal.

Reasons:-
- spoil a beautiful/recreational area
- increased traffic on an already busy road
- no infrastructure to support 40 houses (schools, doctors, roads and public transport).

Very disappointed if this is to be approved.

Object

Representation ID: 18228

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Eliezer Haguma

I have been living in the area for some years,and have appreciated the nature, beauty and recreation the area provides for my family and the neighborhood.

Whilst I appreciate the need for new homes,I see major difficulties if this project proposal was granted.
Considering how close the site is to Baildon C of E school, the issue of traffic which is already not easy to navigate,could be worsened.

Having also found out that the area is green belt(protected) ,I really object the reversal of this given the sanctuary the site provides for both the wild animals and the public.

Object

Representation ID: 18251

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Helen Minting

Ref: Green Lane, Cliffe Lane West, Honey Pot Drive, Stubbings Road, Meadowside Road.

I write regarding concerns to the proposed plans for new housing on the above sites.

More houses would mean further demand on local resources such as GP practices, which are already stretched, dental practices, there are already no vacancies for an NHS dentist in the local area, there would also be more competition for school places.

More roads would mean an increase in traffic which is already heavy in the village.

Fewer trees would mean more flooding, Green Lane in particular already has issues with flooding. The loss of these green spaces would also have a major effect on the local wildlife & would also impact on general well-being.

Object

Representation ID: 18274

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Amy Haguma

•The site is Green Belt and has several TPOs on ancient trees at its border. It should not be built on.
•Development would have a catastrophic effect on wildlife habitats.
•Site is used by walkers, families, horse riders, runners, cyclists. Development would change the outlook from the narrow pathway and quiet cul-de-sac.
•Meadowside Road and Langley Lane are dangerous at school time with no capacity to park. Adding another 40 plus cars to this road would be highly dangerous.
•The site gets waterlogged and may not be suitable for development.
•Both primary and secondary schools are over capacity.
•The site is more than the wildlife and natural beauty it is a retreat for so many from the strains for city life.

Object

Representation ID: 18483

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Danny Breen

• Loss of habitat for wildlife that is enjoyed by both adults and children, which is in contradiction to the Local Area Strategy – Baildon “Protecting and enhancing existing open spaces and green areas”

• Loss of country side that is a well used by the local community for walking, which is again in contradiction to the Local Area Strategy

• The increased traffic resulting from adding the vehicles from 40 houses, will have an severe impact of the existing estate infrastructure that has only one route of ingress and egress that at times is extremely congested which is in contradiction to the Local Area Strategy – Baildon “Delivering new or enhanced infrastructure"

• The local amenities such as schools, shops and health centres is already over stretched which again is in contradiction to the Local Area Strategy – Baildon “Delivering new or enhanced infrastructure"

Object

Representation ID: 19536

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Dr Donna Leusen

Lack of protection to the green belt, ancient woodland (protected by TPO) and also the use of land which has a history of flooding.

Our green spaces ought to be protected without exception.

Regarding section 5.8.33. Here it is mentioned that the four Baildon primary schools are under capacity. By what extent? Detail is not provided.

BA2/H West Lane (1), BA5/H Meadowside Road and BA6/H West Lane (2)

I would like to object in the strongest possible terms to these sites being considered for development. Whilst I understand the pressure to develop land for housing, I believe that more brownfield sites will become available once the effects of the Covid pandemic have been fully realised. Also, the document states that these sites have the potential to deliver a major positive effect for residents on the education SA Objective. This is only the case if there is ample exisiting provision. Currently there is not.

Object

Representation ID: 20173

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Kevin Cockerham

The additional volume of traffic that this development would produce would create even further disruption, air pollution and increased danger to daily life on the surrounding streets and roads, particularly around school opening and closing times. Infrastructure cannot support such an increase in traffic in such a busy area.

The area is used by a considerable number of walkers, runners, horseriders and cyclists etc. and would be a further loss to the green open spaces and the leisure activities that have been enjoyed in this area for many many years.

The fields are greenbelt and can only be used for development if deemed absolutely necessary. I do not accept that we have reached such dire straits where alternative locations cannot be found.

As an absolute minimum, If the development was considered vital then perhaps a lesser number of properties could be built with a reasonable margin at either side of Ladderbanks Lane those preserving such a historical natural thoroughfare.

Object

Representation ID: 20331

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Andrew Murray

Reasons for objection:

- Environment and Character - its green belt land and green space rich in wildlife habitat - spaces which have been invaluable during the covid pandemic and which should be protected;
- Bradford Council's own assessment of this site states: The site has a major potential impact on the Green Belt'' The site has a high potential for sprawl and would have a major impact on openness'
- increased flood risk;
- loss of agricultural land;
- loss of natural views;
- increased pollution;
- increased cars and traffic;
- risk of contamination of groundwater during construction;